Essay regarding The Stroop Effect


The aim of this experiment is to study autonomic processes by simply replicating the previously carried out Stroop impact by using amounts. A number of one hundred and eighty random members aged among 18-89 had been recruited to participate in this experiment. Individuals were presented with a stroop experiment process sheet which will consists of three parts that has been the control, congruent and incongruent circumstances. Time was taken and documented for each participator to say out the number of actors in the control condition and also to say out your number of amounts in the congruent and incongruent conditions. Based on the outcomes, participants got a considerably longer time to the number of quantity in the incongruent condition as compared to the consonant condition. This corresponds to the earlier research carried out by Stroop. Therefore , it can be declared that the powerfully autonomic nature of reading words is just as same as examining numbers, as it is such a well-learned automated activity it will interfere with the work.

The Stroop Effect and the Automatic Procedures

The Stroop effect was initially described in 1935 by the scientist whose name it right now bears. Generally, the Stroop effect refers to the difficulty observers have got in eliminating meaningful yet conflicting info from a task, even when that information is usually immaterial or perhaps counterproductive for the reason that task. The Stroop effect can be seen since interference, that is, when one particular mental procedure degrades the performance of another. Interest is a program, which allows all of us to select and process selected significant newly arriving information. Selective attention refers to the ability to give attention to one activity at a time whilst excluding any eternal stimuli, which may be entertaining. Whereas divided attention identifies the ability to split ones interest between several tasks. If some of these jobs becomes an automatic process it is easier to break down ones interest between both of these tasks. Yet , sometimes rather than being useful, interference can happen between the manipulated process as well as the automatic process (Tzelgov, 1999). Psychologists possess frequently located that the powerfully autonomic nature of examining words or in this case quantities, as it is these kinds of a well-learned automatic activity can interfere with other duties. This thought has been explored by a range of researchers. Kahneman (1973) created a model of divided attention, which was structured around the notion of mental hard work. He recommended that a lot of tasks may be relatively autonomic, so produce fewer requirements in terms of mental effort, for example a reading process. Several actions can be carried out simultaneously, provided that their total efforts does not go over the readily available capacity. Therefore usually an autonomic process will not need much mental effort and thus often can be carried out automatically. (Kahneman, 1973) In an experiment created by Stroop (1935), he accomplished an investigation in autonomic digesting, by inventing the stroop effect. In this, he instructed participants to study a list of color words created in black ink. This, evidently a very simple task was easy for the participants to carry out. Following this, individuals were asked to read a list of color phrases written in conflicting coloured inks, for instance , the word " red” drafted in blue color ink and to phone out the color ink what were written in. Although this task seems very simple at first and is only matter of simple color identification, Stroop identified that it required the members considerably longer to complete this then the previous. This is because, the powerful autonomic or the unconscious nature of reading words meant that individuals automatically wished to read the phrases rather than the color ink these were written in. So , although the participants did not often look at the color phrase out loud, there was a time delay as the participants thought of the correct response which was area ink (Stroop, 1935). This Stroop result can also be found if the participants...

Referrals: Cheesman, T. and Merikle, P. M. (1984). Priming with minus awareness.

Belief & Psychophysics, 36, 387-395. Cited in Eysenck, Meters. W. and Keane, M. T. (2005). Cognitive Psychology: A Scholar's Handbook (Fifth Edition), Hove: The Psychology Press.

Kahneman, D. (1973)

Kahneman, D., and Henik, A. (1979). Perceptual organisiation and focus. In M. Kubovy and J. L. Pomerantz (Eds. ), Perceptual organisation. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Acquaintances Inc. Reported in Brown T. L., Joneleit K., Robinson C. S., Brown C. L.

MacLeod, C. M., & Dunbar, K. (1988). Training and Stroop-like interference: Data for a procession of automaticity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Experience, 14, 126-135. Retrieved Drive 30, 08 from PsycARTICLES database.

information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending, and a general theory. Internal Review, 84, 127-190. Recovered April one particular, 2008 PsycINFO database.

Stroop, J. 3rd there’s r. (1935). Research of interference in dramon verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643-662. Retrieved 04 1, 2008 from PsycINFO database.

Tzelgov, T