The Bush Doctrine: a bent agenda in theory and practice
Doctor Jonathan Signifies
December 18, 2012
Dr . Jonathan Marks
Dec 18, 2012
Research Newspaper: The Bush Doctrine: a bent agenda in theory and practice
The " Bush DoctrineвЂќ represents the foreign policy guidelines of the United States authorities under the administration of Director George Watts. Bush. Even though the phrase was never explicitly referred to or perhaps defined as a cohesive plan, political scientists coined the Bush Regle in order to deal these guidelines into the agenda of the Rose bush administration. The Bush Doctrine included the administration's debatable policies of preventative warfare, spreading democracy around the world, peacekeeping in overseas regions, and a determination to unilaterally pursue the United States' military interests (Jervis 2003). This being said, the objective of this exploration paper is usually to determine whether or not these policies and the agenda of the Bush Doctrine were ethical per the standards established by those who emerged before the government. As the paper clarifies, the evidence overwhelmingly determines that both the intentions and actions contained in the Bush Doctrine are extremely hypocritical on the part of the United States. With this logic, the investigation proves the foreign insurance plan decisions made based on the Doctrine were exceedingly dishonest.
When deciding whether the policies of the Bush administration were unethical, we have to first consider the definition of ethical habit and how that applies to politics leaders. Then, we must study the procedures in the context of American background understand how America's founders predicted these activities. Finally, we have to evaluate the activities of the Bush
administration and determine whether they fit the normal for ethical behavior pursuant to founded political theory.
In order to really grasp the concept of an ethical decision for a personal leader, 1 must have knowledge of fundamental meaningful philosophy (i. e., ethics). Nicomachean Ethics is a reasonable starting point, from where Aristotle asserts that the maximum aim of any decision ought to be universal " happinessвЂќ. This individual argues that happiness should be pursued because what is perfect for the good of society is overwhelmingly recommended to what will work for an individual (Aristotle, pg. 3, col. installment payments on your 1). In the own phrases, " like actions generate like dispositions, вЂќ rendering it the duty of humans to ensure their actions promote stated happiness (Aristotle, pg. twenty seven, col. 1 ) 2). Immanuel Kant's philosophies differed drastically from Aristotle's in Foundations from the Metaphysics of Honnete, in which this individual relates general happiness to a categorical essential command -- which, in contrast to a hypothetical imperative, pertains to all realistic beings irrespective of their own needs (i. e., a specific imperative can be described as universal rules for all logical beings). Relating to Kant, this specific imperative is formulated once rational beings act in a way that they want would be generally accepted. Furthermore, he states that rational beings must act by " dealing with humanity as an end and not as a means only, вЂќ (i. e., human beings must not be " usedвЂќ exclusively to achieve an end goal)(Kant, pg. 34, lacet. 1). What Kant will not consider is the fact, in some instances as such, the sacrifice of humanity as a means to a end can be inherent. Inspite of the ideological variations in these classic philosophies, we can assume that a great ethical decision is one which aims intended for collective, equivalent and testing happiness among all rational creatures. However , since described in the prompt, choosing what will encourage universal happiness can produce an ethical dilemma without having clear solution.
This staying said, it's important to consider how a classical philosophies apply to personal leaders specifically. According to Chinda Tejavanija вЂs article, " Ethics of Personal Leaders, вЂќ...
Cited: 10 Dec. 2012.
Rigstad, Tag. " The Bush Cortege as a Hegemonic Discourse Strategy. " Important Review of
Intercontinental Social and Political Beliefs June 12. 3 (2009): 1-35
Snauwaert, Dale To. " The Bush Doctrine and Just Warfare Theory. " The Online Journal of Serenity and
Resolve conflicts Fall 6th. 1 (2004): 121-35
Prujadhipok 's Start, 2007. Internet. 14 Dec. 2012.
Buenos aires, George. " Washington is actually Farewell Address (1796). " Avalon Job. Yale School,