02.08.2019
 Essay about The Microsoft Antitrust Circumstance

The Microsoft Antitrust Case

An instance Study For MBA Pupils

by Nicholas Economides* Modified April 2003

Abstract The case study covers briefly the economic and legal issues related to the antitrust case of the United States and many States against Microsoft.

2. Stern University of Business, New York University or college, New York, NYC 10012, (212) 9980864, fernkopie (212) 995-4218, http://www.stern.nyu.edu/networks/, [email protected] nyu. edu Copyright В©, N. Economides

2

Items 1 . installment payments on your 3. 5. 5. 6th. 7. Information............................................................................................................................. 3 Antitrust Law In Monopolization And Attempting To Monopolize.......................... 7 Economics Of Market segments With Network Effects............................................................ 9 The Issue Of Affordable prices............................................................................................ 12 DOJ's Monopolization Theory................................................................................... 15 Results On Buyers................................................................................................ 17 Courtroom of Is attractive Decision......................................................................................... nineteen 7. 1 Analysis of the Court of Appeals Decision......................................................... 20 1 . Monopolization from the operating systems industry for Personal computers.................................. 20 2 . Attempting to monopolize the Internet web browser market...................................... 21 3. Tying or braiding Internet Explorer with Windows............................................................... twenty-one 4. Trial Proceeding and Remedy.......................................................................... 21 years old 5. Judicial Misconduct by Judge Jones Penfield Knutson.................................... 21 8. Final Negotiation.......................................................................................................... 22 almost 8. 1 Summary of Proposed Microsoft Settlement of November 6, 2001................... 22 A. Provisions seen as favorable to Microsoft........................................................ twenty-two B. Conditions seen as good to the plaintiffs................................................... 22 C. Duration............................................................................................................ 3 D. Realization........................................................................................................ 23 on the lookout for. Further Studying.......................................................................................................... 23 12. Questions For young students........................................................................................... 24 10. References............................................................................................................... twenty-five

3

The Microsoft Antitrust Case

This case is intended being a teaching device. It gives essential facets of the Microsoft case, although not exhaustive. This rather pays off special attention to aspects of the situation that are best to illustrate essential concepts to students. For the more extensive study of most aspects of the case including a total discussion of remedies, the reader can be referred to Economides (2001). 1 . Facts

Microsoft company is a large diversified software applications manufacturer with one of the highest valuations in the world. Microsoft produces the Home windows family of systems for personal computers and web servers. It also generates applications software program that run on the Windows group of operating systems, most notably the very powerful MSOffice Collection consisting of Expression (word processor), Excel (spreadsheet), PowerPoint (presentations), Outlook (e-mail and news), and Gain access to (database). 1 Almost all Ms products will be complementary into a member of the Windows category of operating systems pertaining to...

References: Backup Brief Of Professor Lawrence Lessig, Us v. Microsoft, Civil Action No . 98-1232 (TPJ). Amicus Curiae Quick Of Mentor Nicholas Economides, United States v. Microsoft, Case No . 98-1232 (TPJ), in http://www.usdoj.gov/atr/cases/ms_tuncom/major/mtc-00022465.htm. Areeda, Phillip and Louis Kaplow (1997), Antitrust Analysis, Aspen Law & Business. Brinkley, Joel and Steve Lohr (2000), U. S. sixth is v. Microsoft, McGraw Hill. Cass, Ronald A., (1999), " Copyright, Licensing, And The ‘First Screen', ” Boston University or college, School of Law. Cass, Ronald A., and Keith N. Hylton, (1999), " Preserving Competition: Economics Evaluation, Legal Criteria And Microsoft company, ” Boston University, Institution of Regulation, Law & Economics Doing work paper no . 99-1. Conclusions Of Rules, United States sixth is v. Microsoft, Case No . 98-1232 (TPJ) & State of recent York versus. Microsoft Civil Action No . 98-1233 (TPJ). Davis, Steven T., Jack MacCrisken, and Kevin M. Murphy, (1998), " Integrating New Features Into The COMPUTER Operating System: Rewards, Timing, And Effects In Innovation, ” mimeo. D'Aspremont, Claude, Jaskold-Gabszewicz, Jean, and Thisse, Jacques-Francois, (1979), " On Hotelling's ‘Stability in Competition', ” Econometrica, vol. 47, pp. 1145-1150. Economides, (1984), The Principle of Minimum Difference Revisited, ” European Economical Review, volume. 24, pp. 345-368, pre-publication copy for http://www.stern.nyu.edu/networks/The_Principle_of_Minimum_Differentiation_ Revisited. pdf. Economides, Nicholas (1996), " The Economics of Networks, ” International Record of Industrial Organization vol. 18, no . a couple of, pp. 675-699, http://www.stern.nyu.edu/networks/top.html. Economides, Nicholas (1998), " Competition and Straight Integration in the Computing Market, ” in Competition, Development, and the Part of Antitrust in the Digital Marketplace, Jeffrey A. Eisenach and Jones M. Lenard (eds. ), Kluwer Academic Publishers 1998, http://www.stern.nyu.edu/networks/98-11.pdf.

dua puluh enam

Economides, Nicholas (2001), " United States sixth is v. Microsoft: An inability of Antitrust in the New Economy, ” UWLA Legislation Review, in http://www.stern.nyu.edu/networks/UWLA.pdf. Economides, Nicholas, and Fredrick Flyer (1998), " Compatibility and Market Structure for Network Goods, ” Discussion Conventional paper EC-98-02, Demanding School of Business, And. Y. U., http://www.stern.nyu.edu/networks/98-02.pdf. Elzinga, Kenneth G., and David E. Mills, (1998), " PC Software, ” mimeo. Evans, David S., and Richard M. Schmalensee, " Be Good to Your Rivals: How the Federal government is Offering an Antitrust Case Without Consumer Harm in Us v. Microsoft, ” in Did Ms Harm Buyers? Two Opposing Views, American Enterprise Institute-Brookings Joint Center for Regulatory Studies, Wa DC 2k. Evans, David S., Albert Nichols, and Bernard Reddy, (1999), " The Climb And Show up Of Frontrunners In Laptop or computer Software, ” mimeo., NERA. Findings of Fact, Usa v. Microsoft company, Civil Action No . 98-1232 (TPJ) & Point out of New York v. Microsoft company Civil Action Number 98-1233 (TPJ). Fisher, Franklin M., and Daniel D. Rubinfeld, " United States versus. Microsoft: An Economic Analysis, ” in Do Microsoft Harm Consumers? Two Opposing Views, American Enterprise Institute-Brookings Joint Center for Regulatory Research, Washington DC 2000. Fisher, Franklin M., Written testimony, Civil Action No . 98-1232 (TPJ) & State of New York v. Ms Civil Action Number 98-1233 (TPJ). Hatch, Orrin (1999), " Antitrust in the Digital Age, ” in Competition, Innovation, as well as the Microsoft Monopoly: Antitrust inside the Digital Market, Jeffrey A. Eisenach and Thomas Meters. Lenard (eds. ), Kluwer Academic Web publishers 1999. Klein, Benjamin, (1999), " Microsoft's Use Of No Price Bundling To Deal with The ‘Browser Wars', ” in Competition, Innovation, as well as the Microsoft Monopoly: Antitrust inside the Digital Market, Jeffrey A. Eisenach and Thomas Meters. Lenard (eds. ), Kluwer Academic Publishers 1999. Lenard, Thomas Meters., (2000), " Creating Competition in the Market for Systems: A Strength Remedy for Microsoft, ” mimeo. The Improvement & Liberty Foundation. Levinson, Robert J., R. Craig Romaine, and Steven C. Salop, (1999), " The Flawed Fragmentation Critique of Structural Remedies in the Ms Case, ” Georgetown University Law Center, Working Newspaper No . 204874.

27

Litan, Robert At the., Roger G. Noll, William D. Nordhaus, and Frederic Scherer, " Remedies Short Of Amici Curiae In Civil Action Number 98-1232 (TPJ). ” McKenzie, Richard N. (2000), Turn to Trial, Perseus Publishing. Reback, Gary M. et approach., Memorandum Of Amici Curiae In Opposition To Proposed Final View, Civil Action Number 94-1564. Plaintiffs' Memorandum Supporting Proposed Final Judgment, United States v. Ms, Civil Action No . 98-1232 (TPJ). Reddy, Bernard, David Evans and Albert Nichols (2000), " Why Does Microsoft Fee So Little For Windows?, ” mimeo. United states of america v. Microsoft, conference by New York University or college (May 5, 2000), in streaming video at http://www.stern.nyu.edu/networks/video.html. United States sixth is v. Microsoft, final judgment (November 12, 2002), at http://www.dcd.uscourts.gov/98-1232cq.pdf.